• Bug
  • Status: Closed
  • 2 Major
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • hhuynh
  • Reporter: ryan
  • June 18, 2007
  • 0
  • Watchers: 1
  • June 29, 2007
  • June 26, 2007


The wicket module should contain the following snipets in the instrumented-classes section:


It is unknown if honor transient is required on either of these entries however honor-transient=true has been tested and works.


Steve Harris 2007-06-18

Thanks! we’ll follow up.

Eelco Hillenius 2007-06-25

I just committed a change that let some classes that were overlooked in the first Serializable -> IClusterable pass. They now implement IClusterable.

incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/breadcrumb/IBreadCrumbModelListener.java incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/markup/html/repeater/data/table/NavigatorLabel.java incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket-extensions/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/extensions/markup/html/repeater/util/SingleSortState.java incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/IComponentBorder.java incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/html/tree/DefaultTreeState.java incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/util/resource/IResourceStream.java incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/validation/IValidator.java incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/validation/ValidationError.java

That should cover it, right?

Ryan Crumley 2007-06-25

That list looks good although I can not remember exactly what classes were giving me issues. The entry for org.apache.wicket.util.template may be because we were accidentally getting a TextTemplate included in session but I will have to verify that. Next time I get back to wicket 1.3 I will update and give these changes a try (probably wont be for a week or so).

Fiona OShea 2007-06-26

Resolved by wicket fix.

Eugene Kuleshov 2007-06-26

Now I am confused. So, do we need separate 1.4 module for wicket or should we add something into 1.3 module to handle Wicket 1.3?

Ryan Crumley 2007-06-26

This fix was applied in the wicket 1.3 svn (wicket 1.3 is not final yet) so no fix is neccesary to terracotta.

Eugene Kuleshov 2007-06-26

Oh. Cool! Thanks Ryan. I got confused by Eelco’s list that says 1.4. Missed last part of your comment about 1.3

Eelco Hillenius 2007-06-26

We (Wicket) keep the projects that are compatible with 1.4 in a separate branch (from the other projects that are 1.5 and up). :)

Fiona OShea 2007-06-28

I think this is OK to close. If all the info is contained in the wicket tree, we shouldn’t have to verify.