• Bug
  • Status: Resolved
  • 2 Major
  • Resolution: Fixed
  • ljacomet
  • Reporter: klalithr
  • November 02, 2012
  • 0
  • Watchers: 4
  • January 11, 2013
  • January 11, 2013

Description

http://forums.terracotta.org/forums/posts/list/7680.page#37330

In the below link http://ehcache.org/apidocs/net/sf/ehcache/event/CacheEventListener.html

The NotifyElementExpired docs say “As the Element has been expired, only what was the key of the element is known.”

According to Alex Snaps in the forum post, this is incorrect.

Comments

Alexander Snaps 2012-11-02

Well, let’s wait to see if there is a reproducible test-case or not… I don’t feel we got all the information yet to dismiss this entirely. Also, even though I think none of the store implementations actually would expose such a behaviour, the question whether we want to guarantee otherwise is another… We might also want to figure out how this made it there to begin with… There _might_ be a good reason for it… I just don’t know about any.

Fiona OShea 2012-11-05

Can we get the javadocs updated to start with.

Alexander Snaps 2013-01-10

Really only is a doc issue

Louis Jacomet Jacomet 2013-01-11

Removed invalid javadoc comment about Element state